How to Understand George Santos’ Claim of Learning His Lesson?

Rate this post

Explore George Santos’ assertion of learning a valuable lesson as we delve into the intricacies of his experience. Gain insights into the context, evolution, and implications of George Santos’ declaration, unravelling the narrative to higher recognize the lessons he purports to have learned. Join us in examining the sincerity and effect of his adventure, providing a nuanced angle at the transformative nature of private increase and self-mirrored image.

Who Is George Santos and What Has He Learned?

As the congressman for New York’s 3rd congressional district since 2023, George Anthony Devolder Santos (/ˈsaentoʊs, ˈsɑːn-/ SAN-tohss, SAHN-tohss; Brazilian Portuguese: [ˈsɐ̃tus]) is an American politician. He was born on July 22, 1988. Santos, a Republican, lost his 2020 campaign against Democratic incumbent Representative Thomas Suozzi and was elected to Congress in 2022. Santos, a Republican, is the first openly gay member of Congress.

Despite calls for his resignation from Congress and numerous legal investigations, George Santos says he’s learned his lesson and has vowed moving forward that “everything is going above board.” “I’ve learned my lesson. I can guarantee you that from now on anything and everything is always going to be above board. It’s largely always been above board. I’m just gonna go the extra step now to double check,” he said to Caitlin Sinclair of the One American News network.

Where Does Santos, 34, Find Inspiration?

George Santos, 34, wavered between being confrontational and defensive in the remarkable new interview when questioned about the lies he had perpetrated about his personal and professional lives. He took on a victim role as well, accusing the media of putting him through a “trial by fire.”

“People ought to be held accountable for their deeds, rather than being subjected to a media trial by fire, as I have been for the past few weeks,” he said.

The Republican congressman from New York claimed he had already apologized for lying, saying it was just about his educational background. He resigned from his committee responsibilities on Tuesday.

The Painful Reality of Falsehoods

He also discussed the embarrassment he had experienced since the lies came to light, stating that he didn’t believe that lying was ever justified. I sincerely apologized more than once. As I previously stated, I sincerely apologize for inflating my résumé and misrepresenting my educational background. There’s probably nothing more that can be stated in a meeting. “Is there anything more demeaning and embarrassing than acknowledging that on a national platform?” he inquired.

But when the journalist questioned him about not seeming remorseful, he became combative, yelling at her, “I don’t know what looking sorry looks like to you.”

The Impact of Saying ‘Sorry’ Many Times

I apologized several times. I pretended to be apologetic. People express emotions in various ways, so it’s difficult to compare them, he added. “I apologize.” I apologize sincerely.

When you question, “Oh, you have not shown remorse and you don’t seem to look sorry,” I’m not sure what is expected of me at that moment. He said to OAN’s Sinclair, “I don’t know what looking sorry looks like to you, Caitlin.”

Since the New York Times revealed George Santos’s fabricated CV and biography claims—which the publication was unable to independently confirm—he has been embroiled in a maelstrom.Prosecutors are looking into him on many occasions about his personal and political donations.

Who Has Tied Him to Members of the Press?

Everywhere he walks on Capitol Hill, reporters are following him. At times, he has been aggressive, retaliating against allegations that he stole funds meant to cover a crippled veteran’s service dog’s life-saving operation after the canine passed away from neglect. At other moments, he has been upbeat, like when he left coffee and doughnuts for the throngs of reporters that follow him outside his office.

He said in the interview with OAN that he was a victim of being a low-income minority child growing up and that he wasn’t “supposed to do big things in life” as “it disrupts the system.”

I had a modest upbringing. I’ve always claimed that I was raised in extreme poverty in Queens, New York City’s Jackson Heights. It is not expected of somebody like me to achieve great things in life. And when we do, the system becomes disrupted,” he remarked.

And I am aware that many individuals are trying to spread the completely untrue story that I lied to get into Congress. I’ve put a lot of effort into building my profession from the ground up using my expertise, experience, and self-education,” he said.

The Controversy Surrounding His Education

He said that in order to be elected to Congress, he had only ever lied about his educational background.

I never offered anything more than what I could afford to. I’ve never had to prove anything or give any misleading information about my own financial situation. I’m the first to admit that I can’t afford to not do that,’ he remarked. ‘I felt the need to do it because I feared that without a credential, I’d be looked down on,’ he claimed, explaining why he had lied about possessing a college degree.

‘I’m not angry at all,’ he answered, seeming annoyed when asked whether he was sorry.’I wouldn’t have lied about the schooling,’ he replied when asked what he would have changed. I would have gotten into a fierce fight.

Among George Santos’s deceptions were:

  • He claimed to have graduated from Baruch College in 2010 with a degree in economics and finance, however a spokesman from Baruch College told the New York Times that Santos was not included in the class of 2010.
  • He claimed to have worked at Citigroup and Goldman Sachs, but neither firm had any documentation of his employment.
  • Where he made his money is unknown. He was employed by Harbor City Capital, an investment company that the SEC claimed to be a Ponzi scam (Santos was not accused of any wrongdoing). He was accused of stealing the chequebook of a guy his mother was taking care of when he was living in Brazil.
  • Although records show she was not in New York on 9/11, he claimed his mother was working in the World Trade Center’s South Tower.
  • He claimed that his grandparents had survived the Holocaust, yet family history shows that they are Brazilian Catholics.
  • Pictures of him wearing drag sparked rumours that he was a drag queen in Brazil, but he insisted he was just having a good time at a festival.
  • A watchdog organization filed a complaint with the FEC alleging he had committed many breaches of campaign finance laws. The group also raised concerns about the loaning of almost $700,000 to his campaign while he only had $55,000 in earned income.


“In summary, understanding George Santos’ claim to have learned his lesson necessitates a close examination of the background, development, and sincerity of his enjoyment. Through examining the subtleties of his journey and the outcomes of his claim, we gain a better understanding of the transforming power of introspection and personal development. Whether greeted with doubt or acceptance, George Santos’ story reminds us of the difficulty in understanding and atonement, and it makes us consider how we could get closer to mastery and development on a personal level.”


Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button